A 33-year-old web developer (10th: 45%, 12th: 55%, BCA: 66%, MCA: 76%, ~10-year study gap covered by work) asked whether the early low marks and the gap make a study permit unrealistic.
What members advised:
- Old low marks affect admission more than the visa — and the upward trend helps. Low 10th/12th scores can narrow which colleges admit you, but they're 'not a show stopper.' Officers and admissions both notice improvement across the academic record (45% → 76%); make that trajectory an explicit selling point in the letter of interest.
- The gap needs a complete story, not just a mention. The formula members gave: a course clearly related to past studies and current work + what the Canadian program adds to your career + a strong, compelling reason to return home backed by real ties. A gap justified by continuous relevant employment is routinely accepted.
- Age 33 is not a barrier by itself — members noted plenty of 30+ applicants getting approvals, though one member with a 12-year gap reported some Toronto colleges refusing admission for 'excess education gap.' College policies vary, so shortlist institutions known to accept long-gap mature applicants.
- Course selection is the multiplier. A member cited a friend with 53% in graduation who was approved after choosing a course tightly relevant to a stronger credential — relevance beats raw percentages.